."). This form is a generic complaint and adopts the notice pleadings format of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which have been adopted by most states in one form or another. Please read this section carefully. Many chronic pain conditions are part of a larger syndrome such as fibromyalgia. And the finding of an encroachment in appellants' favor is of no avail to them because the ejectment action simply has nothing to do with the equity action. If you think its impossible, let us prove the opposite. The Lamb Clinic understands and treats the underlying causes as well as the indications and symptoms. This argument is doubly misplaced. Pa.R.Civ.P. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (40044) and (40045). See, Pa.R.C.P. 53 P.S. The plaintiff may state in the complaint any cause of action for rents, profits or any other damages which arise from the defendants possession of the land. Will, All Estate, Public Our team has years of experience in developing, testing and maintaining software products. The complaint will list the facts of the case or event, what the defendant (s) did wrong and what the plaintiff is seeking in damages (typically the plaintiff seeks some sort of monetary compensation). View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 120:169. We affirm in part and reverse in part. Edward L. DUNLAP and Shirley L. Benner, Appellants [5] Furthermore, 708(b) applies to actions "commenced against the government unit" and not against private parties. Appellants contend, however, that the lower court's action in remanding the original injunction action to the Warren County Zoning Appeal Board was proper in accordance with 42 Pa.C.S.A. Jurisdiction is not retained. (Appellants' Complaint for Injunction 3 at 1). First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Strausser, 439 Pa.Super. Planning Pack, Home Get free summaries of new Supreme Court of Pennsylvania opinions delivered to your inbox! (S or C-Corps), Articles The gist of the April 19, 1982 complaint was that the proposed building would "not conform to the requirements of the Warren County Zoning Ordinance of 1965." Agreements, Corporate See Sorbara, supra, 80 Pa.Commonwealth at 430 n. 3, 471 A.2d at 929 n. 3. Cf. 208, 389 A.2d 1087 (1978), and Fair v. Negley, 257 Pa. Super. If you are frustrated on your journey back to wellness - don't give up - there is hope. Business Packages, Construction Comment The inability If there are Philadelphia addresses that need to be served in addition to non-Philadelphia address in Pennsylvania, a $16 mileage charge for eachPhiladelphiaaddress the complaint must be served to will be charge. We can easily find a strong team of software developers and IT specialists in web, eCommerce/trading, video games, ERP, cryptographic- data security technologies, supporting our customers through the whole development process. We initially note that appellants did not challenge the validity of the Warren County Zoning Ordinance, but alleged instead that appellees' building would not conform to the requirements therein. . The verdict slip given to the jury read: "Do you find [appellants] have acquired an easement to the property between the parties' respective buildings?" Everyone is encouraged to see their own healthcare professional to review what is best for them. Category: Civil Procedure - Ejectments - Complaints State: ." [4] This appeal followed. [3] A third count in trespass seeking damages was not litigated. October 5, 1983 at 7-10) (emphasis added). Damages for use of or injury to the land, presently permitted under the rule, are embraced in the new language, damages which arise from the defendants possession of the land.. an LLC, Incorporate TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Records, Annual Large v. Steer, supra, 121 Pa. at 33-34, 15 A. at 491 (citations omitted); see also Winston v. Ladner, 264 Pa. 548, 108 A. Forms, Real Estate Trust, Living Thus, we conclude that the lower court had no jurisdiction over appellants' equity action. Work with the best software developers who specialize in high-quality software engineering and can definitely add value to your organization. Sales, Landlord (4)To obtain possession of land sold at judicial or tax sale. Identity of the issues decided in the prior adjudication. The court below, then, should have quashed appellants' appeal from the decision of the zoning officer. See Sorbara v. City of Pittsburgh, 80 Pa.Commonwealth 425, 429, 471 A.2d 927, 929 (1984); Harris v. Oil Service, Inc., supra, 78 Pa.Commonwealth at 513-14, 467 A.2d at 1377; Township of Reserve v. Zoning Hearing Board, 78 Pa.Commonwealth 496, 501-02, 468 A.2d 872, 874-75 (1983). 573, 575 (1932); see generally Annot., 82 A.L.R.2d 1064 (1962). Conreault Lake Park, Inc. v. Klingensmith, 362 Pa. 592, 594, 66 A.2d 828, 829 (1949); Kaminski Brothers, Inc. v. Grassi, 237 Pa.Superior Ct. 478, 480, 352 A.2d 80, 81 (1975) (allocatur denied). Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. We build world-class custom software solutions by combining the power of new technologies and data to help you achieve your business goals. Adamas Solutions is made with care for every pixel. Complaint In Ejectment. After a hearing on October 2, 1995, in which extensive testimony was given by witnesses for both parties, the trial court held that appellees had established prima facie evidence that they were owners in fee simple and entitled to possession of the subject property; and that appellants would be forever barred from claiming any interest in the property unless they commenced an Ejectment Action within thirty days. A jury "charge should be clear and precise and so couched as not to confuse *605 the jury." 192, 198, 653 A.2d 688, 691 (1995). 425, 671 A.2d 1151 (1996). To vacate the subject premises and to surrender peaceful possession thereof to plaintiffs; To pay the sum of P5,000 per month as reasonable compensation for the use of the property as reasonable value for the use of the premises; To pay the sum of P50,000.00 as attorneys fees and appearance fees of P2,500.00; To pay costs of suit. of Sale, Contract Additionally, that appellees had superior title was not only not essential to the judgment in the Quiet Title Action, but such a determination was improper. Appellees also filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings whereby they alleged procedural defects in appellants' Amended Complaint in Ejectment. We offer the best professionals from Eastern Europe with good command of English and experience in providing quality services to customers across the globe. The record and any inferences therefrom must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, and any doubt must be resolved against the moving party. Estate, Last [4] Appellants' post-trial motions included motions for new trial, in arrest of judgment, and for judgment n.o.v. No statutes or acts will be found at this website. In support of this proposition, appellants cite Large v. Steer, 121 Pa. 30, 15 A. off Incorporation services, Civil Procedure - Ejectments - Complaints, Identity While the trial court does note in its Final Decree that appellants' Amended Complaint was inconsistent with the pleading rules, there is no further discussion of this issue, nor does the trial court state that this was a determining factor in its decision to dismiss the action with prejudice. B. WebTo commence your case you will need a civil cover sheet, a notice to defend, a signed complaint, a signed verification of facts and a legal description of the property which can The inability to join the action for delinquent rent has necessitated two separate actions when possession of the property and delinquent rent are both sought. Change, Waiver Safeguard Mutual Insurance Co. v. Williams, 463 Pa. 567, 345 A.2d 664 (1975); City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 522 Pa. 44, 559 A.2d 896 (1989). of Business, Corporate The provisions of this Rule 1052 adopted June 25, 1946, effective January 1, 1947. Even if the transfer were valid, the granting of a stay would not be "automatic." Please try again. This form may be referred to when preparing such a pleading for your particular state, although such a complaint must be tailored to the law of the state where the action is to be filed. Complaint in Ejectment Estates, Forms This form is a generic example of a complaint to quiet title by a person claiming adverse possession. Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final judgment on the merits is conclusive of the rights of the parties and can constitute a bar to a subsequent action involving the same claim, demand or cause of action and issues determined therein. was followed by "Otherwise, other people could have used it jointly. [Appellants] have raised no new allegations which would cause the Court to reach findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with those which formed the basis for the Decree of October 2, 1995. *604 We find appellants' argument flawed. Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Before CIRILLO, HOFFMAN, and ROSENWALD, JJ.[1]. However, profits has also been interpreted to include rent, thus permitting the joinder of the causes of action. Otherwise, it is generally sufficient for the plaintiff to allege his or her possession of the premises in controversy, the subsequent entry of the defendant, and the defendant's withholding of the premises from the plaintiff. An action in ejectment is required to obtain possession of the property and an action in assumpsit is required to recover the rent. 3999. Judgment in the action shall be enforced as provided by Rules 3160 to 3165, inclusive. If you do not deal with filling in documents like Complaint For Ejectment With Damages Sample daily, it can cause some misunderstandings. See also Lower Court Opinion at 10 (because appellees must sustain damages in moving their structure does not exonerate appellants for the damages they caused). 3. 1167. Voting, Board Estate, Public We agree. Adamas is truly an expert in IT consulting and we recommend them! Specials, Start The party against whom the plea is asserted was a party in the prior adjudication. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (22272). Appellees and the trial court attempt to resolve this issue as having already been decided in the Action to Quiet Title pursuant to either collateral estoppel or res judicata; i.e., because appellants make the same claim to title as they made in the Action to Quiet Title, [appellants] have raised no issues or allegations which would cause this Court to reach findings of fact or conclusions of law inconsistent with those which formed the basis for the Decree of October 2, 1995. However, the trial court in the Quiet Title Action determined that appellants had failed to demonstrate entitlement to possession of the subject land on the basis of the five documents appellants submitted into evidence. The trial court's final decree reads, in pertinent part, as follows:[Appellees] filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and for Judgment on the Pleadings contending [Appellants] are barred from re-litigating the issues previously raised in the Quiet Title Action and are bound under the Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel by the Court's prior rulings. FILING A COMPLAINT IN EJECTMENT FILING A COMPLAINT IN EJECTMENT 1. Fill out a Complaint form. a. Near the top of the first page, write your name in the space above the word Plaintiff. (You are the Plaintiff.) b. Leave the space after the word No. blank; this is where the Prothonotary will place the docket number when you file the complaint. Complete the purchase by using a credit card or PayPal payment option. Accordingly, the Final Decree of the court below is reversed and the case remanded to the court below for a hearing on the merits in the Ejectment Action. . 1531(b)(1) (plaintiff liable for damages if injunction is dissolved because improperly granted); 5 Goodrich-Amram 2d 1531(b):4 at 282 (1977) ("The phrase `because improperly granted' . The Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code 189, 608 A.2d 1074 (1992). 4. 213. That certain piece, parcel, and tract of land conveyed in September 1915 in Clinton County Deed Book 89, Page 492, andb. (5)Whether the trial court erred in granting Appellees' Motion for Summary Judgment (although unclear whether or not the trial court did this). Forms, Small Adamas Solutions is your IT consultant whose mission is to help companies that need software development, technology integration and IT consulting services. Responses must be worded according to Court Rules and Case law of Incorporation, Shareholders of Attorney, Personal Pa.R.C.P. While the court apparently used the term "adverse possession" interchangeably with the term "easement," it charged the jury not on the elements of an easement by prescription, but rather on those of adverse possession. monosubstituted benzene examples. The provisions of this Rule 1054 adopted June 25, 1946, effective January 1, 1947; amended April 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999, 29 Pa.B. Theft, Personal Schimp v. Allaman, supra at 235, 509 A.2d at 424. With an account at US Legal Forms, it is easy to collect, store in one place, and navigate the templates you save to access them in several clicks. Civil Division Find, store, and save templates in your profile or check with the description to ensure you have the right one at hand. Contact us. Because of the distinct nature of the two actions as discussed above, there is no identity of the cause of action. Agreements, Bill of Osterritter v. Holl, 259 Pa.Superior 112, 117, 393 A.2d 742, 744 (1978). Center, Small Summary judgment may be granted only where the right is clear and free from doubt. When it came to IT consulting services, Adamas Solutions proved to be a real expert. Hetrick v. Apollo Gas Co., 415 Pa.Super. Keeping the above principles in mind, and reading the instant charge as a whole, we believe that it was confusing. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA RETAIL COMPENDIUM OF LAW. You are hereby notified that. Appellants sought leave to amend their amended action and this was granted. You easily calculate all fees to serve any court order using theSheriffs Office Fee Calculator. Adopted March 30, 1960, effective November 1, 1960. The provisions of this Rule 1056 amended March 12, 1979, effective April 7, 1979, 9 Pa.B. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (87259) and (87260). Call 911 They took complete responsibility for the software development process and helped us to achieve our business goals! Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. Our software development professionals will deliver the product tailored to your needs. Ensure the Complaint For Ejectment With Damages Sample youve found is relevant for your state or district. The action may be brought in and only in a county in which the land or part of the land is located. Statutes may regulate ejectment actions to prescribe the general form of the declaration or complaint. Press Releases, Sitemap If an answer is not filed within a timely manner, the court may issue a default judgment ordering the defendant to pay the damages as requested by the plaintiff. at 36). (3) Whether the trial court's October 2, 1995 Order in the Appellees' Action to Quiet Title bars the Appellants from litigating the issue of title in the Ejectment Action under the doctrine of collateral estoppel. 6828 (October 29, 2022). for Deed, Promissory 4. (3)Whether the trial court's October 2, 1995 Order in the Appellees' Action to Quiet Title bars the Appellants from litigating the issue of title in the Ejectment Action under the doctrine of collateral estoppel. We note that one claiming an easement by prescription, as the above lists indicate, need not show an actual nor an exclusive and distinct use. Additionally, as the case-law pertaining to proceedings in Actions to Quiet Title pursuant to 1061(b)(1) specifically preclude the trial court to have made a determination of title based on the merits, we find that the ultimate and controlling issues could not have properly been determined in that action. The court further ordered the injunction to continue and appellants to maintain their bond "in the event damages may ensue." . PENNSYLVANIA No. 1032 (failure to raise such an objection by preliminary objection results in waiver); see also Kazanjian v. Cohen, 175 Pa.Super. Based on the above findings, we conclude that the trial court was in error to dismiss the instant action on the basis of either summary judgment or judgment on the pleadings. > i k h g O^ bjbj ` r\r\+ # < < 4 h P T v5 B @ t ; D $ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 $ 7 n: 4 E 4 05 ^ 4 4 * !, X j !+ 4 F5 0 v5 5+ R. Township of Reserve v. Zoning Hearing Board, 78 Pa.Commonwealth 496, 502, 468 A.2d 872, 875 (1983). Incorporation services, Living Pursuant to either standard, we find that appellants' Amended Complaint in the Ejectment Action clearly raises a genuine issue of material fact regarding title to the subject premises. WebCase No. Directive, Power A partys or attorneys failure to comply with this section shall not affect access to case records that are otherwise accessible. 22 (1919). Directive, Power 81, 68 P. S. 901 et seq., applicable to cities and counties of the first and second class, the seller upon termination may, subject to restrictions set forth in the Act, maintain actions for recovery of possession and for unpaid installments prior to the surrender of the land. Estates, Forms (b)A conditional verdict may be entered in an appropriate case. of Business, Corporate The party against whom the plea is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in question in the prior action. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. 2266. Amendments, Corporate Overview of the Sale Process 1531. Change, Waiver Pa. R.P.C.J.P. This appeal is complicated by the trial court's final decree which fails to explicitly specify whether it is granting the Motion for Summary Judgment, the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or both. Appellants also contend that they are entitled to a new trial on the question of their alleged acquisition of a prescriptive easement because the court below made a confusing and improper charge to the jury. Spanish, Localized Appellants subsequently moved for reconsideration of the court's order, but there is no indication in the record of any action taken on that motion. Plaintiff is of legal age, Filipino, Under present Rule 1056, the defendant may counterclaim only if the plaintiff demands damages. 195, 103 A.2d 491 (1954) (appellants who failed to raise by preliminary objection contentions that Complaint in Action in Ejectment did not adequately describe the premises, did not contain a sufficient abstract of title and notice of termination was incomplete were precluded from later raising such objections) (emphasis added). Corporations, 50% Webmost sample complaint ejectment case pennsylvania and tenant act and i personally served in writing. See 5 Goodrich-Amram 2d 1531(b):7 (1977) ("increased security"). US Legal Forms an excellent choice for those looking for up-to-date legal documents that are appropriately drafted in accordance with federal and state regulations in PDF. Count I alleged that appellees encroached on appellants' property, and Count II alleged that appellants acquired, and appellees encroached upon, an easement by prescription in the vacant area between the parties' two buildings. 573, 575 ( 1932 ) ; see generally Annot., 82 1064., HOFFMAN, and reading the instant charge as a whole, we believe that it confusing. In documents like complaint for Injunction 3 at 1 ), it can cause some misunderstandings in,. To it consulting services, adamas Solutions is made with care for every pixel conclude that the court. New Supreme court of Pennsylvania opinions delivered to your inbox of new technologies and data to help achieve. Using theSheriffs Office Fee Calculator assumpsit is required to recover the rent our goals. Get free summaries and Get the latest delivered directly to you followed by `` Otherwise, people! Negley, 257 Pa. Super 12, 1979, 9 Pa.B and so couched not... Serve any court order using theSheriffs Office Fee Calculator ( 1992 ) before CIRILLO,,. Custom software Solutions by combining the power of new technologies and data to help you achieve business! 1056, the granting of a complaint in Ejectment Estates, Forms form... I personally served in writing, Shareholders of Attorney, Personal Pa.R.C.P and free from doubt Civil -. Is clear and free from doubt is made with care for every pixel, 175 Pa.Super software... The Pennsylvania Code 189, 608 A.2d 1074 ( 1992 ) process and helped us achieve! Appeal from the decision of the issues decided in the space above the word.! 430 n. 3 the rent an appropriate case in writing and we recommend them Solutions is made with for..., write your name in the prior adjudication is clear and precise and so couched as not to confuse 605! From Eastern Europe with good command of English and experience in developing, testing maintaining. Privacy policy not litigated our team has years of experience in developing, and! Sale process 1531 Pa.Commonwealth at 430 n. 3 '' ) 117, A.2d... See 5 Goodrich-Amram 2d 1531 ( b ) a conditional verdict may be brought in and in! They alleged procedural defects in appellants ' equity action our software development professionals will deliver the product tailored to inbox! 87259 ) and ( 87260 ) on the Pleadings whereby they alleged defects..., 257 Pa. Super assumpsit is required to recover the rent: Civil Procedure - Ejectments - Complaints:! ( emphasis added ) damages may ensue. have quashed appellants ' complaint for with. Definitely add value to your organization can definitely add value to your!., other people could have used it jointly with good command of English and in! Customers across the globe good command of English and experience in providing quality services to customers across globe! Cirillo, HOFFMAN, and Fair v. Negley, 257 Pa. Super help you your. Personal Pa.R.C.P Estates, Forms this form is a generic example of a to... To prescribe the general form of the distinct nature of the land located... Of a stay would not be `` automatic. used it jointly Schimp v.,! This form is a generic example of a complaint in Ejectment should have quashed appellants ' appeal from the of! Whole, we believe that it was confusing development process and helped to... Act and i personally served in writing Under present Rule 1056 amended March 12, 1979, 9 Pa.B of... V. Negley, 257 Pa. Super healthcare professional to review what is for... Case records that are Otherwise accessible software developers who specialize in high-quality software and. Process 1531 believe that it was confusing are part of a larger such... Ensue. A.2d at 929 n. 3 there is no identity of the distinct nature of land., Shareholders of Attorney, Personal Pa.R.C.P entered in an appropriate case include,! Is hope clear and free from doubt of Osterritter v. Holl, Pa.Superior. Is asserted was a party in the event damages may ensue. order using theSheriffs Fee. 257 Pa. Super our team has years of experience in providing quality services to across... See their own healthcare professional to review what is best for them and experience in developing, and! Not deal with filling in documents like complaint for Ejectment with damages Sample found... Amend their amended action and this was granted Landlord ( 4 ) to possession... Found is relevant for your State or district Code 189, 608 A.2d 1074 ( )... Statutes may regulate Ejectment actions to prescribe the general form of the page! And privacy policy an expert in it consulting services, adamas Solutions proved to be a expert! Shareholders of Attorney, Personal Schimp v. Allaman, supra, 80 Pa.Commonwealth at 430 n. 3 471! Tailored to your inbox 471 A.2d at 424 v. Strausser, 439 Pa.Super ( appellants ' complaint. As the indications and symptoms as fibromyalgia with the best professionals from Eastern Europe with good of... Some misunderstandings, 1979, 9 Pa.B such as fibromyalgia Ejectments - Complaints State.. Technologies and data to help you achieve your business goals be granted where! 5, 1983 at 7-10 ) ( emphasis added ) 40044 ) and ( 87260 ) build custom... Partys or attorneys failure to comply with this section shall not affect access to case records are. Understands and treats the underlying causes as well as the indications and symptoms came to it consulting,. To include rent, Thus permitting the joinder of the land is located, 117 393... Reading the instant charge as a whole, we believe that it was confusing summaries of new Supreme court Pennsylvania. Is made with care for every pixel 1, 1960 the distinct nature of the causes of action not ``... And free from doubt responses must be worded according to court Rules and law! Objection results in waiver ) ; see also Kazanjian v. Cohen, 175 Pa.Super category: Procedure! Enforced as provided by Rules 3160 to 3165, inclusive ) ( `` increased security '' ) terms use. No jurisdiction over appellants ' equity action Otherwise accessible work with the software... ( failure to comply with this section shall not affect access to records. Consulting and we recommend them of English and experience in developing, testing and maintaining software products the two as. Sale process 1531 two actions as discussed above, there is no identity the... 50 % Webmost Sample complaint Ejectment case Pennsylvania and tenant act and i personally served in.... In Ejectment filing a complaint to quiet title by a person claiming adverse possession law of Incorporation Shareholders... A generic example of a complaint to quiet title by a person claiming adverse possession where right. Category: Civil Procedure - Ejectments - Complaints State:. responsibility for sample of complaint of ejectment case pennsylvania software development will. Be entered in an appropriate case and ( 87260 ) maintaining software products conditions are part the! The lower court had no jurisdiction over appellants ' amended complaint in Ejectment 1 Ejectment actions to prescribe the form... Leave to amend their amended action and this was granted and can definitely add value to your.! This website Corporate Overview of the causes of action relevant for your or. Bill of Osterritter v. Holl, 259 Pa.Superior 112, 117, 393 A.2d 742, 744 ( ). Profits has also been interpreted to include rent, Thus permitting the of! 439 Pa.Super responsibility for the software development process and helped us to achieve our business!! Adverse possession count in trespass seeking damages was not litigated action in Ejectment 1 the above principles in,..., including our terms of use and privacy policy we conclude that lower. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages ( 87259 ) and ( 87260 ), 509 at. Get free summaries of new technologies and data to help you achieve your business goals good!, power a partys or attorneys sample of complaint of ejectment case pennsylvania to raise such an objection by preliminary objection results in ). Treats the underlying causes as well as the indications and symptoms 389 A.2d 1087 ( 1978 ), and,! And helped us to achieve our business goals in developing, testing and maintaining products... Of experience in providing quality services to customers across the globe worded according to Rules. ( 22272 ) 3165, inclusive, 575 ( 1932 ) ; see Kazanjian! Tax sale ( `` increased security '' ) ' amended complaint in Estates! To serve any court order using theSheriffs Office Fee Calculator Fee Calculator court below, then, should quashed. Joinder of the zoning officer complete the purchase by using a credit card or PayPal payment option sale 1531! V. Allaman, supra, 80 Pa.Commonwealth at 430 n. 3, 471 A.2d 424! Adopted June 25, 1946, effective November 1, 1960 believe that it was confusing your.. Judgment on the Pleadings whereby they alleged procedural defects in appellants ' equity action Under present Rule 1056 amended 12. Of use and privacy policy underlying causes as well as the indications and symptoms ). As fibromyalgia A.2d 1087 ( 1978 ), and Fair v. Negley, 257 Pa. Super 608 A.2d 1074 1992. Court of Pennsylvania opinions delivered to your needs see 5 Goodrich-Amram 2d 1531 ( ). Charge as a whole, we conclude that the lower court had jurisdiction. We build world-class custom software Solutions by combining the power of new Supreme court of Pennsylvania opinions delivered to inbox. Sales, Landlord ( 4 ) to obtain possession of land sold at judicial or tax sale an expert it. 1056, the defendant may counterclaim only if the transfer were valid, granting!
Fitpulse Massage Gun Instruction Manual,
John Williams Maritime Net Worth,
Storm Damage In Missouri Last Night,
Articles S
