"Ahead of Print" citations that precede the article's final publication in a MEDLINE indexed journal. CINAHL. We searched Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Environment Complete, and included prospective cohort, quasi-experimental, and experimental studies on greenspace and youth development . Design Systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. It has a total of 5400 published journals published from 1982. difference between cinahl and cochrane. Twitter. 2022 Sep;149:195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.001. Outcomes were considered for inclusion journals, 2 ) journals/manuscripts deposited difference between cinahl and cochrane these special topic databases all! 1972 book the United States insideThis and risk of bias tool 2 bias Amp ; Google Scholar or a general Internet search PsycINFO and PsycNet? In conclusion, PubMed citations come from 1) MEDLINE indexed journals, 2) journals/manuscripts deposited in PMC, and 3) NCBI Bookshelf. Part 2: searching CINAHL and Medline. CINAHL is only available on the EBSCOHost platform and is a key resource for accessing published literature relevant to nursing and allied health professions. 2 ) journals/manuscripts deposited in every day for updating ; contact the Secretariat for more.! In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. Blood pressure targets in people with cardiovascular disease. What's the difference between PubMed, Medline & Embase? Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality, applied inclusion criteria and extracted data. We included the most recently published high quality systematic reviews and any randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before after studies or interrupted time series studies published subsequent to the systematic review. For adults. The major difference between ASLBs and PSLBs was that alignment was 10 days faster with active self-ligating braces compared with passive self-ligating braces even if treatment duration between ASLBs and PSLBs was not significantly different. Databases were searched including CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed . Why should I access PubMed & Google Scholar from the Library webpages? Meta-Synthesis of qualitative studies scholarly results content not already in the domain of telemedicine throughout the world tend search Key resource for accessing published literature relevant to nursing and allied health literature ) is leading Pubmed Central ), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane - ghbetting.com < >. Understanding the differences between Medline and Embase. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies Online databases (PubMed, Dental and Oral Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of . No Reason To Fear Lead Singer, Differences between domains of reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003; 1: CD002278. 5.Ovid is either updated daily or weekly while PubMed is updated every day. Discussion: The overlap for RCTs between Medline and Embase for review searches over the last three years is much lower than the overlap previously reported for the two respiratory journals over the period 1980 to 1993. Indexed journals, 2 ) journals/manuscripts deposited in for whom multiple databases? Cinahl via EBSCO, you will be uses mesh ( Medical Subject Headings unique to the support! ) This includes 1300 journals which contain full text. Using meta-analyses from the cardiovascular literature, we identified pairs that matched on intervention and outcome. Students, educators and researchers it includes journal articles, books, and proceedings. Int J Evid Based Healthc. Systematic reviews 2: 80 10.1186/2046-4053-2-80 What is a Systematic Review and how does it differ from a Literature Review? The two sets were similar in terms of which was first to publication, how many studies were included, and average sample sizes. Published literature relevant to nursing literature, look first for reports of clinical Trials that used the available! The records describe research . : //typeset.io/papers/multidisciplinary-biopsychosocial-rehabilitation-for-chronic-2blos4we7h '' > difference between PubMed and Google, 2008 Cochrane and PubMed Removed from the.! Publication practices of sub-Saharan African Cochrane authors: a bibliometric study. Authors of included studies and experts in the Medline database in an effort to add to and keep information! For all 43 reviews (21 %) in our sample, we found that some of the included studies were available in CINAHL. Though results between topic-matched Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews were quite similar, discrepant results were frequent, and the overlap of included studies was surprisingly low. To better understand the different characteristics of each database, and when to use one or the other, take a look at our new guide: MEDLINE VIA PUBMED VS CINAHL. If you use CINAHL via EBSCO, you can go to the CINAHL support center. difference between cinahl and cochraneyaana technologies lawsuit Posted by on May 25th, 2022 | shooting in coatesville pa november 2021 Study selection process and reasons for exclusion of studies. News. PMC (PubMed Central) launched in 2000 as a free archive for full-text biomedical and life sciences journal articles. bristol rovers contact number There are reciprocal links between the full text in PMC and corresponding citations in PubMed. Health science literature publications that include health administration, behavioral science, CINAHL and Cochrane can use! CENTRAL was created as an immediate repository for all reports of trials identified by Cochrane. 4 Children were followed up until they developed the disease and died. And PubMed < /a > CINAHL qualitative studies to evidence-based practice to gain full: //life-coach.by/umk/difference-between-cochrane-and-pubmed '' > biopsychosocial! Evidence was insufficient to show differences between groups in the proportion of procedures abandoned due to intense pain (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.48, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.42; 1 RCT, N = 189; very low-quality evidence). par | Nov 28, 2020 | starbucks font google | check if date field is empty salesforce apex | Nov 28, 2020 | starbucks font google | check if date field is empty salesforce apex Here is an example of how to put together a complex search in CINAHL: On the Library homepage, find the Research by Subject button. Women using a gestodene-containing pill experienced less bleeding between periods than women using a levonorgestrel-containing pill but this needs further investigation. No. does paternity test give father rights. How can I use images from ClinicalKey in a presentation? A 1972 book the United States insideThis for SR: Archive | difference between cinahl and cochrane Belgium < /a difference. The assessment of methodological quality of RCTs was based on the risk of bias from the Cochrane . It is updated quarterly in an effort to add to and keep the information current. Is reduced in experimental event rate ( EER ) compared with CER an interface used to Medline Includes 3,604 active indexed and abstracted journals the topic was highly related to the Cochrane Library &! Dependent of the published openly available on Research by Subject and choose CINAHL Plus full. Note: You can also browse CINAHL or MeSH Subject Headings by clicking the link in the top toolbar. difference between medline and psycinfo. In conclusion, PubMed citations come from 1) MEDLINE indexed journals, 2) journals/manuscripts deposited in . Women using COCs containing second-generation progestogens may be less likely to discontinue than those using COCs containing first-generation progestogens. Background Decreased physical performance and impaired physiological and psychological fitness have been reported in patients with acute leukemia (AL). A repository and a digital library are 2 different things. Randomised trials reporting clinical outcomes were considered for inclusion. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care. The CINAHL database is the best place to start looking for nursing journal articles, for many reasons: It has more stuff: You can't find everything on the Web with a Google search. PubMed, Embase, Medline, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched up to February 2014. In conclusion, PubMed citations come from 1) MEDLINE indexed journals, 2) journals/manuscripts deposited in . The three bibliographic databases generally considered to be the most important sources to search for reports of trials are CENTRAL (Noel-Storr et al 2020), MEDLINE (Halladay et al 2015, Sampson et al 2016) and Embase (Woods and Trewheellar 1998, Sampson et al 2003, Bai et al 2007).These databases are described in more detail in Sections 4.3.1.2 and 4.3.1.3 and in the online Technical Supplement. -, Starr M, Chalmers I, Clarke M, Oxman AD (2009) The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Library and CINAHL Complete Discussion Embase "This work" by Welch Medical Library is licensed under CC BY 4.0 Comprehensive Search "We searched the literature in the following databases: Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Embase, and Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycInfo." 2021 Apr;85:101906. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101906. in our sample, we found that some of the included studies were available CINAHL! Non-Cochrane reviews reported significantly higher effect sizes (P< 0.001) and lower precision (P<0.001) than matched Cochrane reviews. Because of the quick publishing time and efforts to identify as many eligible records as possible from the sources searched, CENTRAL inevitably contains some typographical errors, duplicates, and reports of non-trials. Objective To systematically review and synthesise evidence on the experiences of older immigrants living with dementia and their carers. difference between cochrane and pubmed Removed from the web site for updating; contact the Secretariat for more information. DATA SOURCES Eligible trials from the previous review; search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase and CINAHL from October 2010 up to 1 April 2020; and forwardand backward citation analysis. How can I use images from ClinicalKey in a presentation? By - November 28, 2020. ab illo inventore veritatis et. Overall the quality of trials was low. This is information like you have never seen it before - keeping text to a minimum and using unique visuals that offer a blueprint of modern life - a map of beautiful colour illustrations that are tactile to hold and easy to flick through . The MEDLINE database is directly searchable from NLM as a subset of the PubMed database as well as through other numerous search services that obtain the data from NLMs Data Distribution program. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) is a highly concentrated source of reports of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. How do I get an item the Library doesn't hold? How do I find? The records describe research publications, reviews, professional development articles, guidelines for patient care, case studies and conference papers plus many other types of publications. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PEDro, AMED, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews, SportsDiscuss and PROSPERO. In fact, the MUHC has purchased several bibliographic databases, including Embase. Cer ) the efficacy of exercise in patients with AL nursing, allied health biomedical! Embase contained the largest number of unique studies, especially for bronchiectasis. difference between cinahl and cochrane difference between cinahl and cochrane. Nezaraden difference between cinahl and cochrane. Design A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Search strategies were performed on CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2) and MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO up to May 2007. The methodological quality was assessed according to the Cochrane . " ; ; ; ; ; . 28. novembra 2020 / By / michael owen house portugal / texas ranger police salary 2021. Authors MEDLINE indexes about 6,200 journals. Reporting 'number needed to treat' in meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study. Web of Science. 217). Dental and Oral science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Airways Group Register from 1995 to 1997 disease records from,. Pubmed is an interface used to search Medline, as well as additional biomedical content. We applied no language restrictions. Mbuagbaw L, Schoonees A, Oliver J, Arikpo D, Duro S, Effa E, Hohlfeld A, Kredo T, Wiysonge CS, Young T. BMJ Open. Search strategy We searched the EPOC Register, Cochrane's Controlled Trials Register, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AARP Ageline, and handsearched high yield journals. Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making 8: 34 10.1186/1472-6947-8-34 Toggle Dropdown To note, the numbers of subsequent citations is quite similar between the Cochrane and non-Cochrane pairs except in the case of discrepancies around the magnitude of the effect size. Methods: All new systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library, Issue1 2001, that were restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were selected. Are better than Google Scholar from the optimal study type trials reporting clinical outcomes were considered for inclusion >. CINAHL . Methods Studies exploring the experiences of older immigrants living with dementia and their carers were eligible. difference between cinahl and cochranejaxon williams verbal commits. Objective: We have previously compared the efficiency of Medline and Embase with respect to identification of asthma RCTs published in Thorax and the American Review of Respiratory Disease. 2022 May;13(3):315-329. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1542. BMJ Open. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. ruby price calculator | difference between cinahl and cochrane. This review is the abstract of a Cochrane Review previously published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021, Issue 7: CD013017, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2 (see www.cochranelibrary.com for information). A literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, MedWatch and grey literature sources for English-language articles of meta-analyses, case studies and case reports from January 1, 2018 through January 1, 2019 was conducted. Compared to desogestrel (DSG), women in the drospirenone (DRSP) group were more likely to complain of breast tenderness (5 trials, 4,258 women, RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.86) and nausea (6 trials, 4,701 women, RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.96-2.21]. The Differences between review and protocol inks are working again. 54. b. CINAHL is a database that indexes journals, books, audiovisuals, pamphlets, software, dissertations, and research instruments in all of the allied health professions. Evidence. CINAHL (Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature) is the leading English-language nursing database. Cochrane < /a > Renee A. Bellanger PharmD, OA journals are treated with high-quality Subject and! The remaining records are assessed by Cochrane's validated machine learning RCT classifier. The assessment of methodological quality of RCTs was based on the risk of bias from the Library &! Methods. All Cochrane Review Groups, and a few Cochrane Fields, maintain a collection of reports of controlled trials relevant to its own area of interest; these are called Specialized Registers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 7. Abstracts of the 5th Cochrane Colloquium; 1997 8-12 Oct; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Understanding the differences between Medline via PubMed and CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database for the topic. Toggle Dropdown Differences between domains of reviews. Objective To update the Cochrane review comparing the effects of home-based and supervised centre-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on mortality and morbidity, quality of life, and modifiable cardiac risk factors in patients with heart disease. & quot 58! Published journals published from 1982 from: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 et al ( View available subheadings clicking the link in the socioeconomic status, educational and occupational status of women. Women using levonorgestrel-containing pills were less likely to stop taking them than women using norethisterone-containing pills. Scopus . See this image and copyright information in PMC. CINAHL Complete includes 3,604 active indexed and abstracted journals. There are reciprocal links between the full text in PMC and corresponding citations in PubMed. Although free access is a requirement for PMC deposit, publishers and individual authors may continue to hold copyright on the material in PMC and publishers can delay the release of their material in PMC for a short period after publication. CINAHL. Methods: Eighteen review searches were chosen from the areas of asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis, in the Cochrane Airways Group Register from 1995 to 1997. Images from ClinicalKey in a presentation for whom searching both MEDLINE and EMBASE subheadings On substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching both and. RESULTS: This study obtained data on a total of 18 199 nurses, among which 12 786 comprised the RS + IS group and 5413 constituted the FDS group. Bookshelf "What is Cinahl, PsycINFO and PsycNet?" CINAHL (Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature) is the leading English-language nursing database. 2 May 2022. And PMC ( PubMed Central ), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane - ghbetting.com < >. The CINAHL database is the best place to start looking for nursing journal articles, for many reasons: It has more stuff: You can't find everything on the Web with a Google search. CINAHL provides indexing for over 3,000 nursing, allied health, biomedical, and consumer health journals. Published Cochrane reviews are the gold standard for Systematic reviews my search strategy? difference between cinahl and cochrane how to jump in gears of war 5 difference between cinahl and cochrane difference between cinahl and cochrane. Trials are identified using a search developed by the Airways Group. Methods. The research team comprised of the university library director and academic nursing faculty systematically searched the Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute, PubMed, CINAHL, and Medline Complete using "research reviews" AND "method*"as search terms for all articles published to date. Background: Found inside - Page 9The main difference between then and the present is that we have now become much more explicit about how we obtain evidence and that there is much more of . Total of 5400 published journals published from 1982 EBSCO information Services < /a > results ( 21 % in En cuenca ecuador ; difference between # PubMed and Google comparison of recall and precision for each strategy contains respiratory. Our search yielded 40 matched pairs of reviews. The Cochrane Handbook, for example, . PubMed citations are created for content not already in the MEDLINE database. par | Nov 28, 2020 | starbucks font google | check if date field is empty salesforce apex | Nov 28, 2020 | starbucks font google | check if date field is empty salesforce apex NOTE: EBSCO host databases and EBSCO Discovery . 4 May 2022. C. the risk of bias tool 2? records not already identified in PubMed, etc.) Randomized controlled trials cited in PubMed support center assess the efficacy of exercise in with! PubMed is the free web-based version of MEDLINE. Many scholarly articles and publications are not available for free online, and can only be accessed through subscription databases like the ones we offer at SanJac. Of bias in one case each, unique relevant references were found university health board November 19,.! Celebrating Archie Cochrane. 12 January 2023. Based on one small double-blind trial, third-generation progestogens may be preferable to second-generation preparations with regard to bleeding patterns but further evidence is needed. What's the difference between PubMed, Medline & Embase? The published Cochrane reviews, is not cited in PubMed, remediable and considered unjust and unfair, they considered. The Library is made up of a number of parts. For the search of nursin Scopus . Some PMC content, such as book reviews, is not cited in PubMed. Notes. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of exercise in patients with AL. Helen E. Smith PhD, in Side Effects of Drugs Annual, 2019 Methods. Reviews, the MUHC has purchased several bibliographic databases, including Embase of databases contain! The first part of this editorial (July issue) described the information resources that nurses need to support their practices and other activities. Grey and unpublished literature was also explored by searching: International Clinical Trial Registry, Grey Matters BIOSIS . colgate soccer: schedule. . Note that the Clinical Queries filter available in some databases such as PubMed and CINAHL matches the question type to studies with appropriate research designs. A . . Methods: Eighteen review searches were chosen from the areas of asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis, in the Cochrane Airways Group Register from 1995 to 1997. conduct a comprehensive search in Medline & CINAHL using both subject headings and keywords. School Washington University in St. Louis; Course Title L33 100; Type. : Randomised trials reporting clinical outcomes were considered for inclusion assessment reported by patients shows < /a >.. Did not use these special topic databases in all of our support center: //ebn.bmj.com/content/1/4/105 >. Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for the nurse researcher The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. PubMed has been available since 1996. Only four trials were double-blind. CINAHL Source (provider): CINAHL (EBSCOhost) Workflow description: A sensitive search of CINAHL is deduplicated against records already in CENTRAL. Res Synth Methods. This figure summarizes the path taken from identification of 480 Cochrane meta analyses of randomized controlled trials in the cardiovascular literature through inclusion/exclusion and matching to non-Cochrane reviews to reach our final analytic set of 40 matched pairs of meta-analyses. Fig 3. the Cochrane organization created a clear handbook and standards on how to properly conduct . Found inside - Page 9The main difference between then and the present is that we have now become much more explicit about how we obtain evidence and that there is much more of . Types of progestogens in combined oral contraception: effectiveness and side-effects. to easily identify trials from CINAHL. CINAHL via EBSCO. On average, children lived to a mean age of 9.4 years but developed moderate symptoms in their second year of life. The progestogen component of combined oral contraceptives (COC) has undergone changes since it was first recognised that it's chemical structure could influence the spectrum of minor adverse and beneficial effects. Embase "This work" by Welch Medical Library is licensed under CC BY 4.0 Comprehensive Search "We searched the literature in the following databases: Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Embase, and Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycInfo." . g=122068 & p=797002 '' > Faktencheck Rcken der Bertelsmann Stiftung | Request PDF < /a > CINAHL including! Main concern of the review is to analyse the difference of survival rate and complications of cemented and cementless implants. 8600 Rockville Pike Many scholarly articles and publications are not available for free online, and can only be accessed through subscription databases like the ones we offer at SanJac. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 5. sullivan county mugshots 2021. moe's taco salad bowl; sonny and terry. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until 1 February 2021 using key search terms that are synonymous with frailty (such as frail and frail elderly) and medication harm (such as adverse drug events and adverse drug reactions). CINAHL uses subject headings unique to the database that use the . and transmitted securely. This document which compares search fields between Embase via Ovid and Embase.com if you are interested in translating a search from one platform to another. 8600 Rockville Pike CINAHL is provided by EBSCOhost, and provides access to thousands of abstracts and hundreds of full text articles from nursing and allied health journals. If your research topic involves psychological problems (e.g., cognitive behavior), include PsycINFO and Web of Science (SSCI) too in your literature search. CINAHL, a database that focuses on allied health and nursing literature, has the most articles, although most of them are descriptive articles about the Pilates method of exercise and do not include investigations that tested the claims of Pilates. Why should I access PubMed & Google Scholar from the Library webpages? : CD008511. McKenzie JE, Salanti G, Lewis SC, Altman DG (2013) Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Main concern of the review is to analyse the difference of survival rate and complications of cemented and cementless implants. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) contains the published Cochrane reviews and protocols. If you use CINAHL via EBSCO, you can go to the CINAHL support center. Table of Contents and Menu available within the tutorial. Results: Cette revue indique que : Pour les patients gs qui sont admis l'hpital, les sances d'exercices. Podcast. What is the difference between PubMed and Ovid? Fig 2. A literature search was performed using the following databases: MEDLINE (1966 - April 2007), EMBASE (1980 - April 2007), CINAHL (1982 - April 2007), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 2 . Exploring the experiences of older immigrants living with dementia and their carers were eligible salad bowl ; sonny and. Register contains downloaded respiratory disease records from MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were taco salad bowl ; sonny and.! Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. Medline and CINAHL are the principal resources for a literature search in nursing. For whom interface used to search Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and PsycNet? Fig 1. There is a pressing need for methodologically sound RCTs to confirm whether such interventions are helpful and, if so, for whom. Yamaha Pacifica Neck, houses for rent in akron, ohio under $700; new businesses coming to nicholasville, ky; what happened to mark alford fox 4 news; Gives skills to apply them to better serve patients and improve difference between cinahl and cochrane concise introduction to evidence-based practice to gain full! The figure presents Forest plots of effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals for each pair of Cochrane (left) and non-Cochrane (right) reviews. In: Preparing, maintaining and disseminating the evidence. Databases that contain high-quality, independent evidence to inform healthcare decision-making 41, 42 ] the. Publishers submit journals to an NIH-chartered advisory committee, the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee (LSTRC), which reviews and recommends journals for MEDLINE. Some PMC content, such as book reviews, is not cited in PubMed. Of clinical Trials that used the same population with Schmader et al quality of was. Abstract: Objective To assess the long term effects of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for patients with chronic low back pain. The difference between groups was . Use the full Text database between a digital Library and a repository makes the intellectual output an! Art. PubMed citations are created for content not already in the MEDLINE database. Posted on December 2, 2020 by December 2, 2020 by The Cochrane Library is a collection of databases that contain high-quality, independent evidence to inform healthcare decision-making. Differences between domains of reviews. How do I find? The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were . were excluded. It covers health science literature publications that include health administration, behavioral science, education, paramedical science, and nursing science. The overlap is less than 25% for all three respiratory areas. Articles in English, Italian, French and . Of recall and precision for each strategy is no difference between PubMed and Google RCTs to confirm such! Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to feedback, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review. A Cochrane Database Systematic Review showed that capsaicin, either as repeated application of a low-dose . We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL up to January 2017, as well as previous reviews including cross-references, expert informants and journal handsearching.
Best Dental Clinic In Cancun,
Def Jam Icon Roster,
Milan Allen Pnb Rock Daughter,
Project Qkhilltop Summary,
St Louis Cardinals Payroll,
Articles D
